Skip to main content

Too Smart to Get Caught


When I was growing up, I was taught that abuse was something that happened to disadvantaged people. Uneducated people. Trashy people. People who, because of their social status, "didn't know any better." If a woman was hit by her husband, it was too bad that she was too dumb to be with him to begin with. If a child was beaten, it was also too bad, but we all know how kids can be annoying. When I was a kid, physical abuse was the only kind of abuse I ever heard about. Sexual abuse was too taboo to mention. Emotional abuse simply didn't exist.

My parents were reasonably well educated. They had professional careers. We lived in the suburbs. Therefore, in their minds, it was impossible for them to be abusive. After all, we had a roof over our heads and we were not starving or bleeding. Usually. My parents had created all sorts of complex ways to barricade themselves from the truth of their own behavior. They were (and still are) incapable of understanding that abuse comes in many forms.

Enough had happened by the time I was a toddler for me to be removed permanently from my parents, and for them to go to jail. Yet, there was no possible way for anyone to intervene.

Over the last thirty years or so, we've come a long way, collectively, in recognizing various forms of sexual and emotional abuse, and its long-term, insidious effects. It's always been widely acknowledged that a calm, supportive, loving home environment is the best kind, but in my family, there was a major disconnect. We were supposed to be "normal" because we were middle class. Was irrational yelling normal? Were drunken rages normal? Were silent grudges normal? Was it normal for a young child's daily routine to be to get herself off to school, come home to an empty house, and spend the rest of the day alone in her room? Was it normal for a teenager to be reluctant to have her friends spend the night because her father would walk around naked in front of them? Was it normal to have a mother who passive-aggressively talked her children about wanting to leave, but made vague excuses, like, "Well, he's handy around the house..."

The facade had its cracks at home, but even so, my parents tried their best to maintain it. More important, however, was for them to maintain it at all costs in public. My mother was especially skilled at putting on a good face. She was professional. Her persona was friendly. She had a casual laugh. She would make comments about whatever her children's most recent accomplishments were. Her mask was on at all times. She had fully convinced herself that she was a good person, dammit. It is because of her enormous denial that kept all those secrets in place that made her so much more complicated to deal with.

My father's alcoholism and erratic behavior was harder to mask as he got older, but that actually was a huge relief to me. It meant that some other people actually saw that something was off. After many years when the alcoholism was finally admitted, it quickly became the excuse for everything. The alcohol made him do it. He didn't remember because of the alcohol. Even so, admitting that something was at fault was a step toward chipping away the facade.

My husband worked for a time in the medical division of a county jail, where I occasionally volunteered. As a writer, it was a wonderful opportunity for me to interact with a population of people I wouldn't normally have access to. I thought I might interview some criminal masterminds, as expected from watching too many TV procedurals. Perhaps I was picturing some exchange with Hannibal Lector. Instead, I did mundane tasks, like comb the lice out of a pregnant inmate's hair. Of course, as any hairdresser knows, it's a good way to get to know people. What I discovered was that there were a number of humble, kind- hearted people behind bars. They made mistakes and freely admitted it. They were sincerely sorry for their actions. Some simply needed their meds. Others simply needed counseling. Many of them got caught simply because they were not smart enough not to. As a child of people who were too smart to get caught,  I found this deeply refreshing.








Comments

  1. Yes! Yes! Yes! The smart ones are the scary ones. And more often than not, they seem to hide easily in educated, middle- to upper-class homes because "those people don't have problems like that." Or maybe we just have enough shiny toys to dazzle everyone and deflect the attention of astute observers? ❤️ I continue to be so grateful for your willingness to speak out.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Difference Between Trauma and Anxiety

I've been living with the effects of complex trauma for a long time, but for many years I didn't know what it was. Off and on throughout my life, I've struggled with what I thought was anxiety and depression. Or rather, In addition to being traumatized, I was anxious and depressed.  All mental health is a serious matter, and should never be minimized. If you are feeling anxious or depressed, it's important and urgent to find the right support for you. No one gets a prize for "worst" depression, anxiety, trauma or any other combination of terrible things to deal with, and no one should suffer alone. With that in mind, there is a difference between what someone who has CPTSD feels and what someone with generalized anxiety or mild to moderate depression feels. For someone dealing with complex trauma, the anxiety they feel does not come from some mysterious unknown source or obsessing about what could happen. For many, the anxiety they feel is not rational...

No, There Are Not Two Sides

  I was in a meeting where a mediator was trying her best to stay impartial to a situation where a large volume of well-documented verbal and emotional abuse had occurred. She was a trained professional, but professionally speaking, she didn't want to be in a position to take sides on the issue. She offered the worn-out platitude, "Well, there are two sides to every story..." I let it slide the first time she said it, but when she said it again, I stopped her. "Actually, when it comes to abuse, there are not two sides. There is abuse, and there is the recipient of abuse. The recipient of abuse is not at fault for the actions of the abuser." Her jaw dropped a moment, then she nodded slowly. She knew I was right, and in this moment, a light went on. The situation she was mediating was not about two people having a disagreement. It was about a serial abuser attacking someone else who had done nothing to provoke the attack. She couldn't stay impartial. It ...

Why Psychological Trauma is More Damaging Than Physical Trauma

You were lied to on the playground.  "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me." Neuroscientists and psychologists have proven in spades that words hurt most of all. But first, let's establish that abuse of any kind is horrible, heinous, and deserving of attention and care. The impact of physical trauma ought never be minimized in order to shine a light on psychological trauma. Not only is all trauma valid, all perceptions of trauma are valid. Two people can experience the same event and have drastically different outcomes. One's experience isn't more or less valid than another. If it hurts, seek help. Physical trauma is visceral. There is hard, objective evidence of abuse. Most people don't question its validity. It's cut and dry. "If he hits you, you should leave." If you are beaten or shot in a senseless crime, no one will try to convince you it didn't really happen. Children who are physically abused are ...