Skip to main content

No, There Are Not Two Sides

 

I was in a meeting where a mediator was trying her best to stay impartial to a situation where a large volume of well-documented verbal and emotional abuse had occurred. She was a trained professional, but professionally speaking, she didn't want to be in a position to take sides on the issue. She offered the worn-out platitude, "Well, there are two sides to every story..." I let it slide the first time she said it, but when she said it again, I stopped her.

"Actually, when it comes to abuse, there are not two sides. There is abuse, and there is the recipient of abuse. The recipient of abuse is not at fault for the actions of the abuser."

Her jaw dropped a moment, then she nodded slowly. She knew I was right, and in this moment, a light went on. The situation she was mediating was not about two people having a disagreement. It was about a serial abuser attacking someone else who had done nothing to provoke the attack. She couldn't stay impartial. It was her professional and legal duty to take action.

Too often, victims of abuse exhaust all the channels of communication and mediation only to be told that they must have misunderstood their abuser, or maybe they just need to see the other person's point of view. The problem with telling a victim of abuse that there are two sides to every story is that it implies they did something wrong for the abuser to treat them that way. It's too often used as a deflection of the hard truth that the abuser did what they did on purpose, with an intent to harm. People tend to give others the benefit of the doubt sometimes because it's too painful to accept that some people really are monsters.

People who are not educated about narcissists, psychopaths, and other Cluster B personality disorders don't understand that conflicts that arise from such people are not misunderstandings. There is nothing that can be said or done to mediate, because the abuser lacks empathy.

When someone reacts in an abusive way, there is no excuse. If a normal person says or does something out of line, they will recognize it, feel true remorse, and offer an apology. A normal person is capable of feeling sorry for someone they hurt. A disordered person will never admit fault, and will double down on their abusive behavior. A disordered person will seek to destroy anyone who challenges them. Their lack of empathy means they are only able to see themselves as victims, never any one else.

So, no, there are not always two sides to every story. There is only truth.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Difference Between Trauma and Anxiety

I've been living with the effects of complex trauma for a long time, but for many years I didn't know what it was. Off and on throughout my life, I've struggled with what I thought was anxiety and depression. Or rather, In addition to being traumatized, I was anxious and depressed.  All mental health is a serious matter, and should never be minimized. If you are feeling anxious or depressed, it's important and urgent to find the right support for you. No one gets a prize for "worst" depression, anxiety, trauma or any other combination of terrible things to deal with, and no one should suffer alone. With that in mind, there is a difference between what someone who has CPTSD feels and what someone with generalized anxiety or mild to moderate depression feels. For someone dealing with complex trauma, the anxiety they feel does not come from some mysterious unknown source or obsessing about what could happen. For many, the anxiety they feel is not rational...

Why Psychological Trauma is More Damaging Than Physical Trauma

You were lied to on the playground.  "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me." Neuroscientists and psychologists have proven in spades that words hurt most of all. But first, let's establish that abuse of any kind is horrible, heinous, and deserving of attention and care. The impact of physical trauma ought never be minimized in order to shine a light on psychological trauma. Not only is all trauma valid, all perceptions of trauma are valid. Two people can experience the same event and have drastically different outcomes. One's experience isn't more or less valid than another. If it hurts, seek help. Physical trauma is visceral. There is hard, objective evidence of abuse. Most people don't question its validity. It's cut and dry. "If he hits you, you should leave." If you are beaten or shot in a senseless crime, no one will try to convince you it didn't really happen. Children who are physically abused are ...